Bev Perdue’s Small Business First Approach
Bev Perdue is proud of
Yet Bev knows that
Bev also recognizes that the state’s tax structure is an important underlying factor in economic development. She understands that a smart approach to business taxation requires balancing multiple concerns about our tax structure.
It is important for
But the specific tax rates on corporations and individuals matter – and must be subject to periodic reevaluation and adjustment if we hope to send the right competitive signals to businesses we want to attract or retain. At the same time, revenue also matters. A state’s tax structure must always raise enough revenue to fund quality education, an adequate health care safety net, and other services vital to businesses and their employees and to keep our state’s economy ahead in today’s competitive global race.
One traditional view holds that a state’s economic development strategy should concentrate simply on lowering business tax rates, even at the expense of maintaining current levels of revenue available for education and other social infrastructure. The John Locke Foundation and a few others still express the most extreme version of this view, advocating total elimination of the state’s corporate income tax – a move that could create a hole in the state’s budget as large as $1.7 billion.[1]
As a lawmaker, Bev explored these issues in the mid-1990’s as the General Assembly considered steps it could take to render the state more attractive to businesses contemplating expansions and re-locations here.[2] She helped sponsor bills that offered various strategies for reducing corporate taxes, including one that proposed a significant phased–in reduction.[3]
But from that experience, Bev took away a strong belief that the state should make targeted adjustments to its corporate tax structure and take other actions to enhance its economic competitiveness in particular spheres, rather than attempt drastic reductions. The small business sector is a key policy target for such adjustments because it has emerged in recent decades as the chief generator of new jobs and business innovation. As our next Governor, Bev Perdue will make sure that this targeted pro-small business approach is a centerpiece of our state’s economic development strategy.
Below are two examples of the targeted approach that Bev will pursue as
1. A Bottom-Up Approach for Small Business Tax Relief
Our smallest corporate entities, however, have few, if any, such advantages. That makes their effective rate much closer to 6.9% on every dollar of income they earn –often much higher than most bigger and more profitable businesses.
Bev Perdue believes that
Many small businesses struggle for years simply to survive, and they need the legal protections provided by incorporation. Taxing the first dollar of their profits at the highest corporate rate does not send the right message about their importance to our economy and way of life in
Bev believes a good starting point for change is the small-business tax reform plan first developed in the state Senate during the 2004 session. Under that plan, companies that make a net profit of less than $100,000 would be able to exempt their first $25,000 of net income from the 6.9% rate. Companies making between $100,000-200,000 would be able to exempt the first $15,000. The estimated budgetary cost of such a targeted exemption plan was estimated to be $18 million.[5]
2. Providing a Leg Up to
A bottom-up tax relief approach will signal that
Over the last two years, the state has been developing this kind of targeted initiative to boost high-technology ventures across
The One North Carolina Small Business Fund currently provides an automatic matching grant to
The federal SBIR and STTR programs award grants to companies to develop marketable technologies that are of special interest to the federal government. Eleven federal agencies participate – ranging from the Department of Defense to the Department of Agriculture and the National Science Foundation. Each agency, by law, must set aside 2.5% of its annual budget for SBIR-STTR awards. While SBIR grants go exclusively to private sector entities, STTR grants target business-university partnerships. The SBIR-STTR grant process is highly competitive and known for its very rigorous merit-based standards.
Phase I SBIR-STTR grants typically provide crucial funding of around $100,000 – the kind “seed” of funding so many infant high-technology enterprises need to start their development. The One NC Small Business Fund provides a state matching grant that in effect doubles the amount of seed capital available for
The Business Journal has also observed that
Underscoring the program’s success, Phase 1 SBIR grants from the federal government to
The program has made, to date, 120 grant awards totaling $8.2 million to
Bev is a strong supporter of the state’s new SBIR matching-grant initiative. And as
[1] John Locke Foundation, “Agenda 2006: A Candidate’s Guide to Key Issues in North Carolina Public Policy”
[2] E.g., from the 1995 session, Senate Bill 12, Senate Bill 69, Senate Bill 79, Senate Bill 826, Senate Bill 8 (1995E2) and House Bill 18 (1995E2).
[3] See, e.g., Senate Bill 826 (phase corporate rate to 1.75%); Senate Bill 12 (phase corporate rate to 7%).
[4] See News and Observer, “New Faces of Small Business: Minorities and Women Fill an Entrepreneurial Void.” (June 11, 2000).
[5] Associated Press, “Senate Democrats Seeking Corporate Income Tax Break in Budget” (June 14, 2004). The Senate plan was a somewhat scaled-down version of a small-business tax reduction plan proposed by Governor Easley in his 2004 budget.
[6] Triangle Business Journal, “State’s Small Business Bureaus Match Has Companies Queuing Up,” (February 23, 2007).
[7] Triangle Business Journal, “Feds Pay, State Pays, Startups Win,” (September 30, 2005).
[8] Triangle Business Journal, “State’s Small Business Bureaus Match Has Companies Queuing Up,” (February 23, 2007).